Measuring Discharge Outcomes, Length of Stay, and Functional ADL Score During COVID-19 in Inpatient Rehabilitation Hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: To measure discharge disposition, length of stay (LOS), and functional activities of daily living (ADL) scores for patients admitted to acute inpatient rehabilitation hospitals (IRHs) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and to compare these parameters with a period prior to the pandemic. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study via systematic retrospective chart review of consecutive patients admitted to IRHs from January 1-February 19, 2020 (pre-COVID-19T), and COVID-19 time period/patients admitted from April 1, 2020-May 9, 2020 (COVID-19T). SETTING: System of 3 IRHs in the Northeastern United States. PARTICIPANTS: Pre-COVID-19T, n=739; COVID-19T, n=335, of whom n=139 were positive for COVID-19 (COVID+) and n=196 were negative (COVID-) (N=1074). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Discharge disposition, LOS, and functional ADL scores. RESULTS: COVID-19T patients were younger (P=.03) and less likely to be White (P=.03). These patients also had a higher case mix index (CMI; P<.01), longer acute care LOS (P<.01), and longer IRH LOS (P<.01). Patients who were COVID+ (during COVID-19T) were less likely to be White (P<.01), had lower CMI (P<.01), had higher admission and discharge functional ADL scores (P=.02, P<.01), and had longer acute care LOS compared with those who were COVID- (P<.01). There were no differences in discharge outcomes between pre-COVID-19T and COVID-19T cohorts (P=.75), including when stratified for COVID-19 status (P=.74). Functional ADL scores on admission and discharge were lower in COVID-19T than in pre-COVID-19T (P=.01), including when stratified for COVID-19 status though not significant (P=.06). CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in discharge outcomes for any group. IRH LOS was significantly increased during the pandemic, but there were no statistically significant differences between the COVID+ and COVID- cohorts within COVID-19T. Functional ADL scores were significantly lower during COVID-19T, but COVID status was not a significant predictor. This suggests that COVID+ status was not a barrier to discharge or functional outcomes. This supports the importance of IRHs to restore function and discharge patients to home, even with a more medically complex COVID-19 pandemic population.

Screening for Deep Vein Thrombosis in Persons With COVID-19 Upon Admission to an Inpatient Rehabilitation Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of deep venous thrombosis detected by duplex screening and risk factors associated with deep venous thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 upon admission to an inpatient rehabilitation hospital. DESIGN: This is a retrospective review. SETTING: The setting is three freestanding inpatient rehabilitation hospitals operating as one system. PARTICIPANTS: The participants are consecutive patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation hospital without a diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis or screening duplex ultrasound prior to transfer. INTERVENTIONS: A duplex ultrasound of lower limbs was performed upon admission to inpatient rehabilitation hospital. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was the percentage of admission patients with a lower limb deep venous thrombosis. Secondary factors included potential risk factors for a positive screen for deep venous thrombosis. RESULTS: A lower limb deep venous thrombosis was diagnosed in 22% (25/113) of the patients tested, with eight patients (7.1%) having a proximal deep venous thrombosis. Risk factors for screening positive for a deep venous thrombosis included being male, younger, and having been on a ventilator during the acute illness. CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of deep venous thrombosis observed in these patients suggests that the risk of venous thromboembolic disorders after severe COVID-19 illness is considerable and surveillance measures of such patients should be undertaken.

Screening Testing for SARS-CoV-2 upon Admission to Rehabilitation Hospitals in a High COVID-19 Prevalence Community.

BACKGROUND: While planning for the care of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients during the pandemic crisis has dominated the focus of leaders of inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), patients with injuries/illnesses unrelated to COVID-19 continue to need inpatient rehabilitation admission. To maintain a safe environment for all patients and staff, we established an admission screening plan of testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) to determine the presence of asymptomatic patients who were infected with the virus upon admission. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of patients who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 but were presumed to be COVID-19 negative at the time of admission to IRF in New Jersey. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of SARS-CoV-2 testing results. SETTING: Four freestanding IRFs in New Jersey operated as one system. PATIENTS: All (N = 103) patients sequentially admitted from 4 to 27 April 2020 with no symptoms or evidence of COVID-19 disease at the time of transfer from the acute hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Specimens were collected for SARS-CoV-2 analysis at the time of admission to the IRF and patients were monitored for subsequent symptom development over the next 14 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results of SARS-CoV-2 testing upon admission and evidence of development of clinical signs or symptoms of COVID-19. RESULTS: Seven asymptomatic persons (6.8% of admissions) without clinical signs/symptoms of COVID-19 tested positive on admission. Of these, five developed symptoms of COVID-19, with a mean onset of 3.2 (range of 2-5) days. Five additional patients became symptomatic and tested positive within the next 3 to 10 days (mean of 5.2 days). Overall, 11.6% of admissions (12/103) had a positive test within 14 days of admission. CONCLUSIONS: Admission testing to postacute centers for SARS-CoV-2 can help identify presymptomatic or asymptomatic individuals, especially in areas where COVID-19 is prevalent. Negative results, however, do not preclude COVID-19 and should not be used as the sole basis for patient management decisions.